Yes i do agree that they do catch a lot of junk because stirring or moving them stir up a lot of green water.
Ceramic vs live rock.
Ok everybody condemn bio balls and ceramic rings as detritus catchments tools and creating a nitrate factory.
1 it delivers grit to hard to reach rock surfaces.
Some manufacturers moved from the lava grate system because the lava rock would crumble and leave a mess in the grill.
2 it is used to cushion fragile rock materials during the tumbling process.
3 it is used to improve the tumbling action in the tumbler barrel.
You won t find this bacteria in plastic or foam filter media.
The ceramic briquette was introduced to replace the lava rock as a cleaner more heat retentive alternative.
Tumbling media has four functions.
These bacteria eat nitrates and will only survive where there is no oxygen present.
In addition to launching their live rock replacement vida rock cerameco has also develoepd techniques for producing large handmade ceramic reefscapes and backgrounds.
And 4 it is used as a filler to make up for lost volume after the coarse grit and medium grit steps.
Ceramic rings can hold a second beneficial bacteria.
Bio balls and ceramic rings vs live rock in the sump.
Denitrifying bacteria live deep inside rock ceramic and other porous materials where oxygen cannot reach them.
Since the withdrawal of reef ceramics from the american aquarium market there has been a void of ceramic reef structures available to reef aquarists but these new pieces from cerameco are not only more interesting but.
Ceramic briquettes vs lava rock.
In its natural state it is very porous and will readily absorb liquids and staining agents.
Unglazed materials are usually chosen over more durable options because of the.